You found a Google Play Store dataset. You downloaded it. You opened it.
Now you're staring at 20+ columns wondering which ones actually matter and which ones are noise.
That confusion is more common than people admit. Most resources tell you the dataset "contains app metadata." That's not an answer. This post is.
Here's a complete, field-by-field breakdown of what a Google Play Store dataset includes, what varies by source, and how to decide what's worth your time.
Regardless of where you get the data, whether it's Kaggle, a third-party provider, or a custom scrape, these fields show up consistently.
These are the basics. Every row in the dataset maps to a single app.
These fields tell you how an app is performing in the market.
Here's what most guides won't tell you: not all Google Play Store datasets are built the same.
Kaggle datasets are usually static snapshots. A third-party data provider scrapes continuously. A raw scrape you run yourself gives you the most control but requires the most cleaning.
The fields that vary the most across sources:
|
Field |
Kaggle Snapshot |
Third-Party Provider |
Custom Scrape |
|
Last Updated Date |
Sometimes |
Usually |
Yes |
|
Version Number |
Rarely |
Sometimes |
Yes |
|
Android Version Required |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
Yes |
|
App Size |
Sometimes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Short Description |
Rarely |
Usually |
Yes |
|
Full Description |
No |
Sometimes |
Yes |
|
Permissions |
No |
Rarely |
Yes |
|
Screenshots/Media URLs |
No |
Rarely |
Yes |
If your use case depends on any of the bottom rows, a Kaggle dataset likely won't cut it.
This is the counter-intuitive insight most analysts skip past.
Google does not publish exact install numbers. What you get is a bucketed range. 1M+, 5M+, 10M+. That means an app with 1.1 million installs and an app with 4.9 million installs are indistinguishable in the dataset.
Why does this matter?
Most junior analysts treat install ranges as exact figures. That's a data quality error that compounds through every downstream insight.
This question comes up constantly, especially from developers and students building projects for the first time.
Structured datasets (Kaggle, Crawl Feeds) come pre-cleaned. Column names are consistent. Missing values are handled. You can load them straight into pandas or a BI tool with minimal friction.
Raw scraped data is messier but more current and more complete. You'll deal with:
For learning projects and academic work, structured datasets are fine. For production use cases, competitive intelligence, or building a data product, you want raw scraped data with a cleaning pipeline you control.
A Google Play dataset isn't just the columns it ships with. It's also the derived signals you can build from it.
A single rating score means very little. Combine it with review volume and you get real signal:
Cross these three fields and you get a competitive positioning map. It's one of the fastest ways to identify underserved segments in a category before building or investing.
If you're a developer wondering whether to use the dataset or hit the API directly, here's the honest answer.
Use the dataset if:
Use the API (or a scraping pipeline) if:
The dataset is a snapshot. The API is a feed. They solve different problems.
No. Not even close.
The most commonly included fields across all public datasets are: app name, category, rating, installs, price, and content rating. That's the floor.
Everything beyond that, including description text, last updated date, app size, version info, and developer contact details, depends entirely on who built the dataset, when they scraped it, and what their use case was.
Before you download any dataset, check the column list first. Match it against the specific questions you're trying to answer. If the fields aren't there, the dataset won't answer your question, no matter how large it is.
Last Updated Date.
It's often missing from older Kaggle datasets, which is exactly why you should care about it.
An app's update frequency is a strong proxy for developer activity, user retention investment, and product health. Apps that haven't been updated in 18+ months are either abandoned, deprecated, or running on pure organic traffic.
For market analysis, filtering out stale apps changes your category-level averages significantly. For competitive intelligence, it's the fastest way to separate active competitors from legacy ones.
If your dataset doesn't include this field, it's worth building a pipeline to enrich it.
Now that you know what's in the dataset, the next step is matching your question to the right fields.
Here's a quick mapping:
|
Your Goal |
Primary Fields to Use |
|
Market sizing |
Category, Installs, Price |
|
Competitive benchmarking |
Rating, Reviews, Installs, Category |
|
Monetization analysis |
Price, In-App Purchases, Installs |
|
App discovery / recommendation |
Category, Rating, Reviews, Content Rating |
|
NLP / ML model training |
Description, Reviews text, App Name |
|
Developer profiling |
Developer ID, App Count, Update Frequency |
A Google Play Store dataset is only as useful as your understanding of what's in it.
The fields aren't complicated. But the assumptions people make about them, especially around install counts, rating reliability, and data freshness, are where most analyses go wrong.
Browse hundreds of pre-built datasets from CrawlFeeds โ ecommerce, reviews, fashion, news, and more. Free samples on every dataset.
Browse datasets Custom data request